Evaluation
Full Embodiment-Healing Sexual Trauma
Questions in red are required
The program objectives were met.
1. Demonstrate a variety of targeted exercises that can be utilized in private practice, which will help clients heal from sexual trauma and sexual dysfunction
2.
Identify practitioner implicit biases, plus topics concerning sexuality with which participants are uncomfortable.
3.
Recommend practices that help clinicians feel more at ease discussing sexuality issues with clients, and have a wider scope of knowledge and education about sexuality and sexual issues
4.
Practice self-awareness and inquiry about places of discomfort or avoidance in their own bodies so that they don’t unconsciously harm clients
5.
Utilize a number of techniques that support clients in recognizing sexual triggers and how to return to a state of autonomic regulation.
6.
Review the research of “Dual Mode Model of Sexual Dysfunction” as a tool to identify specific areas of comfort and discomfort in client’s relationship to their sexuality.
7.
Apply exercises that are designed specifically to help clients find ease and pleasure intheir bodies after trauma to the body
8.
Practice ways of working effectively with shame. Will include lecture, live demonstration and practice exercise
9.
Discuss the anatomy and physiology of sexual response, which includes “arousal non-concordance”, often contributing to confusion and shame.
10.
Demonstrate the most effective ways of working with extremely dissociated clients.
11.
Describe specific, non-traumatizing techniques for re-working childhood sexual abuse
12.
Discuss and understand the tendency to “appease” as a legitimate survival strategy
13.
Distinguish and identify strategies to minimize clients’ tendencies to get re-violated aftersexual assault.
14.
Practice boundaries and “embodied consent”, so clients can find their most “authentic” “yes” and “no”.
15.
Identify specific techniques on working with couples when one partner has sexual traumain their history.
16.
Recommend ways of supporting individuals with low libido or those in long-term relationships to find new ways of reawakening their arousal
17.
Apply knowledge that discusses the unique qualities of male sexual abuse survivors.
18.
List extensive resources which includes books, articles, podcasts, movies, documentaries and TED talks for further learning and inquiry
19.
Accuracy and utility of content were discussed.
20.
Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training.
21.
Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training.
22.
Teaching methods were effective.
23.
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content.
Presenter: Ariel Giarretto, LMFT
1. Knew the subject matter
2.
Taught the subject completely
3.
Elaborated upon the stated objectives
4.
Presented content in an organized manner
5.
Maintained my interest
6.
Answered questions effectively
7.
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions
Professional & Ethical Issues
Presenter made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following:
1. Requirements for successful completion of activity
2.
Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)
3.
Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest
4.
Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)
5.
Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks?
1. Facility was adequate for my needs (if applicable)
2.
Special needs were met (if applicable)
3.
Facility was comfortable and accessible (if applicable)
4.
Food and beverage were adequate (if applicable)
5.
Program brochure was informative and accurate (if applicable)
1. Information could be applied to my practice (if applicable)
2.
Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals.
3.
Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered.
1. How much did you learn in this course?
2.
Did this program enhance your professional expertise?
3.
Would you recommend this program to others?
Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply)
If Other, list your profession
Please note years in your profession
What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?
What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?
What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?
31. How did you hear about this event (please be specific as to where you saw an ad, from what group you received an email, etc.)?